Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
571-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

571-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.972738 50.865550)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.972667 50.865542,-0.972670 50.865556,-0.972680 50.865569,-0.972695 50.865579,-0.972715 50.865585,-0.972737 50.865588,-0.972759 50.865586,-0.972779 50.865579,-0.972795 50.865570,-0.972805 50.865557,-0.972809 50.865543,-0.972806 50.865529,-0.972796 50.865517,-0.972781 50.865507,-0.972761 50.865500,-0.972739 50.865498,-0.972717 50.865500,-0.972697 50.865506,-0.972681 50.865516,-0.972671 50.865528,-0.972667 50.865542)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL